VDH UltraOne Long, Long Angry Letter: Part Four
3. Would the media prefer to help her win but lose further credibility themselves by failing to ask why she has disowned her last three decades of leftist agendas, or to reclaim some of their reputations and thereby risk her losing?
Facts: Harris was a prosecutor and Attorney General of California whereby she prosecuted crimes without bias. She was accused of in fact being too harsh on crime and not sufficiently going after environmental polluters. When she ran in the Democratic Presidential Primary, she did in fact propose progressive remedies for many problems that were endured by the poor and underserved. During her term in office as Vice President, she has learned which of the proposals and wishes of the progressives and the middle class can become law and a [sic] reality. In fact, Harris should be praised for supporting the middle and underserved classes
Are you sane? Harris helped support the California law greenlighting looting and shoplifting up to $950; she endorsed the most radical Soros prosecutor in the U.S., Los Angeles’s George Gascón, after even the San Francisco voters threw him out.
Harris “ran” in “2020” only metaphorically, since she so turned off her own constituents that she exited the race in December 2019 and never entered a single primary election. Nor has she ever since; and has also never won a single delegate by voting.
You are arguing that for the first time in her life, now during her 90 days of transformation, Harris will suddenly embrace fracking, champion border security, oppose illegal immigration, insist on tough policing of demonstrations and protests that turn violent, back off from the green new deal, renounce support for late-term/partial-birth abortions, vote to fund and expand the police, increase the defense budget, and reject single-payer, mandatory health insurance. And she will suddenly no longer want to force mandatory confiscations of semi-automatic weapons by the government? No longer wish to “snatch” patents? No longer to abolish ICE?
A better interpretation of Harris the Chameleon is that three decades ago it was politically smart to be a reasonable liberal on crime, so she was in her Bay Area races. Then years later it became even more reasonable to be woke and leftwing in California, so she was too in her statewide attorney general and senate races, and during her 2019–20 primary race (again, she failed to enter a single primary election).
Then as Vice President, she xeroxed Biden’s sharp move to the left as part of his Faustian bargain made with Democratic kingpins who in March 2020 had anointed him the candidate.
And now as she runs against Trump, she sheds yet a fourth time her exoskeleton to become something new and “centrist”—for 90 more days. If she supported the middle classes, she would not have signed on to Biden’s hyperinflationary politics and his 2021–22 war on energy that saw gas prices double, nor let in 10 million illegal aliens, nor pushed for reparations.
4. Does the Left appreciate the new campaign and election protocols it has now established?
That is to say:
Cancel by fiat their virtual nominee four months before the election when he sinks in the polls?
Nullify the outcome of a year of primaries and the will of 14 million voters?
Threaten a sitting president with removal by the 25th Amendment process unless he steps aside as his party nominee?
Anoint a replacement nominee before the convention and without a single primary—and then prevent any rival candidates from challenging her?
Facts about Biden’s withdrawal of his Candidacy:
It became obvious during the first Presidential debate that President Biden was not up to building a campaign for the next run for the Presidency. Even though Biden won all the primaries because no one wished to challenge the incumbent, many of his supporters saw that Biden had sharply declined with age and worried about the future results of the next election. Biden wanted to continue his campaign but because of his decreasing poll numbers many supporters including Hakeem Jeffries, Chuck Schumer, Adam Schiff, Nancy Pelosi, etc.; advised Biden that he could not win the election and Biden’s further campaigning might affect the down ballots. No Biden’s [sic] threatened to evoke the 25th amendment but this idea was bandied about by the Republics and right-wing media. Biden withdrew his candidacy for the good of the Democratic Party, for a stable future democracy of the country, and to leave his legacy of great accomplishment and sacrifice. Biden and his supporters felt it would be in the best interests of the Democratic Party because of the short duration before the election to rally rapid support for his Vice President and hence Biden’s primary electors quickly swung [sic] their support to Kamala Harris. No rival candidates came to challenge Harris and thus shortly after won wide support of the Party. This unity of the party around her candidacy was able to energize potential voters and delegates before the Democratic Convention.
Your absurd account is reminiscent of Pravda’s changing narratives. Do you expect us to believe the ridiculous tale that Biden was only suddenly and obviously revealed to be debilitated on the basis of one single disastrous debate? You know he was known to be demented as early as the 2020 primaries of which he lost the first three for that very reason.
The correct explanation is that your party and the Left demonized all who long knew he was non compos mentis for months if not years. He was deposed not because of his dementia per se but only because his mental and physical unfitness could no longer be kept hidden and, most importantly, caused his polls to tank.
Had his polls remained strong, then your party would have had no problem keeping a cognitively challenged candidate as your nominee and a useful empty vessel for his Obamaite handlers. We know that because the cabal who removed him determined that he was unfit mentally to serve as their nominee in the sense of guaranteeing their defeat, but apparently quite fit to serve as the American people’s president for another six months and thus maintain the Left’s hold on power.
Once again you dissimulate about the president’s removal from the ticket: Biden did not wish to step down and swore he would not do so in uncertain terms unless God himself so directed him. He remains bitter and petulant that he was forced out through two levers: one, the donor class threatened (https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/17/us/politics/biden-democratic-donors-trump.html) to cut off his campaign funding and essentially had already pulled back, and two, it was leftwing sources (https://seymourhersh.substack.com/p/leaving-las-vegas) who had access to Biden and the Democratic cabal who removed him, who reported the threat of a 25th Amendment removal from his presidency by his former leftwing friends and allies (https://nypost.com/2024/07/22/us-news/top-dems-threatened-to-remove-biden-unless-he-resigned/).
Nancy Pelosi at first denied she had threatened Biden by revealing disastrous inside polls and using other pressures; then when she saw how relieved her party was at his implosion, she suddenly pivoted and began loudly and proudly claiming responsibility for the coup.
The post VDH UltraOne Long, Long Angry Letter: Part Four appeared first on VDH’s Blade of Perseus.
