Ex-CNN Analyst: Comrade Kamala, ‘Not Great in Interviews’
You don’t have to be a CNN analyst to see how incompetent and pea-brained the Democratic Party’s nominee for president is. Ever wondered what’s in her track record or what her agenda of governance is? You won’t see anything because there is none.
Former CNN Analyst Chris Cillizza even made things worse when he exposed Comrade Kamala Harris for what she is: a fraud.
Cillizza quipped that Harris is not holding many interviews because she’s just not good at it.
There are more things Cackling Kamala fails, but one very apparent thing is her constant avoidance of the media.
Video by Nicholas Pagnotta.
Click the button to follow him on Rumble!
The ex-analyst quipped that Harris not only struggled during her softball interview with MSNBC’s Stephanie Ruhle, but she also had a hard time in her past interviews as well.
“I thought Stephanie Ruhle was exactly who I thought she would be, which is, I thought she was pro-Harris but fair, right? When Harris didn’t answer a question, I thought she was like, ‘Well, that’s not really answering the question.’ So she clearly prefers Harris to Trump — Ruhle does — but I didn’t think it was like over-the-top ridiculous,” Cillizza remarked.
Ruhle, who also suffers from Trump Derangement Syndrome, defended Harris’ failure to answer questions about policy because as every unhinged Democrat believes, former President Donald Trump is a “threat to democracy.”
Cillizza said, “But I didn’t think Harris was great. I thought on tariffs her answer wasn’t particularly good, on the economy her answer wasn’t particularly good.”
“I just — she’s not great in those settings like she wasn’t great in the CNN interview, she wasn’t great in the MSNBC interview. There’s a reason she’s not doing a lot of those interviews.”
MSNBC host argued that a presidential candidate doesn’t need to know anything about tariffs.
“Well, part of it is, you just don’t throw around the idea of tariffs across the board. That’s part of the problem with Donald Trump. Frankly, I’m going — I say this in all sincerity — he’s not very serious about how he thinks about some of these issues,” the border czar remarked.
“And one must be serious and have a plan and a real plan that’s not just about some talking point ending in an exclamation at a political rally. But actually putting the thought into what will be the return on the investment. What will be the economic impact on everyday people?”
In short, there is no plan for tariffs, at least among woke-infested Democrats.
Harris again insisted that wealthy Americans and businesses must “pay their fair share” of taxes, a script she loves to deliver when pressed about the economy and taxation.
Pollster Frank Luntz torched Scamala and said, “We’ve heard it now for how many years, 30, maybe 40? What exactly is fair share? … And the issue with that is it’s a sound bite, it’s a slogan. And I know that I’m a messaging person so that’s my job.”
“However, the public demands a detailed plan of action and they’re not getting it from her.”